Author: Groucho

  • Allrecipes (Audit March 2025)

    Allrecipes (Audit March 2025)

    About the brand: Allrecipes was one of the biggest winners in the SERPs for 2024 (see 2024 SERPs Winners and Losers), and that’s why I wanted to take a closer look at it.

    Allrecipes has been owned by Dotdash Meredith since 2012. Some more context about the brand history was provided by Dustin Woodward, who did some pioneer SEO for the brand between 2005 and 2007!

    source: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-founding-story-of-AllRecipes

    The SEO Team: The only SEO dedicated to the brand I could find on LinkedIn is Elizabeth Laseter, who joined the company in October 2024. I’m not entirely familiar with the Dotdash organization, but I bet they have a larger chain of command.

    Organic Search traffic

    Looking at the long-term trend, traffic appears to have recovered to its previous peak after setbacks beginning in 2021.

    • The first drop occurred in June 2021, a month marked by four Google Updates: Page Experience, Core Update and two spam updates (source: Google).
    • Another drop aligned with a page experience update in February 2022.

    In my experience, over-analyzing algorithm updates to pinpoint specific traffic movements is rarely relevant and often counterproductive. However, the ‘Page Experience’ updates might have played a role here. Google has excellent related guidelines to follow, and these self-assessment questions are a great start.

    Answering yes to the following questions means you’re probably on track in providing a good page experience:

    • Do your pages have good Core Web Vitals?
    • Are your pages served in a secure fashion?
    • Does your content display well on mobile devices?
    • Does your content avoid using an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
    • Do your pages avoid using intrusive interstitials?
    • Is your page designed so visitors can easily distinguish the main content from other content on your page?

    See Understanding Google Page Experience (Google)

    Not having the changes history or data access, I won’t be able to answer those questions retroactively and am limited to analyzing archives.org and ahrefs/semrush traffic estimations.

    Content Analysis

    Looking at the top pages since 2020 already provides some valuable information:

    1/ A strong brand

    Traffic to the Homepage has remained relatively stable (except for 2023), suggesting a strong brand. Allrecipes is a destination brand, which I believe is one of their most significant assets.

    A Search Trend comparison against their biggest SERP competitor supports the narrative:

    source https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=US&q=allrecipes,foodnetwork,thekitchn,delish&hl=en

    Also, a quick Google search reveals that users are searching for recipes explicitly from Allrecipes, suggesting a base of satisfied and returning users, and implying quality content.

    2/ Recovering Pages

    Pages that were once driving a lot of traffic for the brand got in trouble, but they managed to turn things around.

    Analysis: https://www.allrecipes.com/recipe/20144/banana-banana-bread/

    (side note: I don’t understand why the page is called “banana banana bread”, it’s in the URL, title and images so it is not a mistake)

    In 2022, the page was minimalist/efficient:

    • List of ingredients
    • Instructions
    • Nutrition facts
    • Reviews

    But I guess as competition increased, it was not enough to satisfy Google (it was probably still enough for users, to be fair).

    In 2023, a new template is released and features a lot more details:

    • A more detailed list of ingredients
    • New pictures
    • A summary of the instructions (overkill and confusing IMO)
    • Relevant questions (ie. How to store, can you freeze, how to make it moist etc.)

    I strongly believe in prioritizing user experience to improve SERP rankings. I have direct experience restoring pages to top positions for competitive search queries by implementing UX improvements and minimal content changes.

    In that case, while successful, I regret the additive approach as it didn’t significantly improve the user experience. A better approach would be to:

    • Prioritize the most relevant information at the top (ingredients, directions)
    • Include a clear FAQ section to tackle the common questions (no fluff)
    • Remove the redundant sections and clarify the content structure. Examples of redundancies: How to make / Directions, Kitchen Tips / Community Tips / FAQ

    Ultimately, the page is not easy to read and has a confusing structure:

    <H1> Banana Banana Bread
       <H2> Banana Bread Ingredients
       <H2> How to Make Banana Bread
          <H3> How to Make Banana Bread Moist
          <H3> How Long to Bake Banana Bread
       <H2> Test Kitchen Tips
       <H2> How to Store Banana Bread
          <H3> How Long Does Banana Bread Last?
       <H2> Can You Freeze Banana Bread?
       <H2> Allrecipes Community Tips and Praise
       <H2> Ingredients
          <H3> Local Offers
       <H2> Directions
       <H2> Nutrition Facts (per serving)
       <H2> Ask the Community (23)
       <H2> Reviews (13,177)
          <H3> Featured Tweaks
       <H2> Photos of Banana Banana Bread
       <H2> You'll Also Love

    The same applies to other pages

    e.g. it seems counterintuitive to start a buttercream recipe with “What is buttercream” yet it’s sadly common practice for which the SEO industry’s “good practices” are largely to blame… https://www.allrecipes.com/recipe/174347/quick-and-almost-professional-buttercream-icing/

    Picture of an SEO training the editorial team

    3/ Some Missed Opportunities

    Several non-recipe pages, which enjoyed past success, would benefit from being reactivated.

    Categories: As is, the pages bring very little added value, they could be targeting more concepts such as ‘family dinner recipes’, ‘dinner ideas’

    e.g.

    https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/17562/dinner/
    https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/

    Cooking 101: There are so many other queries they can rank for with such an authority in cooking. A good example is that article untouched since 2022 despite its past success
    https://www.allrecipes.com/article/commonly-used-measurements-equivalents/

    History of positions for ‘oz to cups’

    4/ Beyond the evergreens, How to Stay Current

    It is critical for a brand to build its presence and visibility throughout the year. Allrecipes covers the main calendar events: Halloween, Ramadan, Super Bowl, etc.

    But also covers brillantely other events that makes the website much more relatable e.g. 18 Egg-Free Cake Recipes to Make While Prices Are Skyrocketing

    on top of their news section which covers recalls and freebies.

    That’s surely a winning strategy in Top Stories and Google Discover.

    User Experience

    Overall, the website offers a great user experience:

    • Ads are not too disruptive
    • The ‘jump to’ buttons (jump to recipes / nutrition fact) make up for the debatable structure
    • Browsing the gallery is easy
    • They include video recipes by their test Kitchen
    • Extra features for printing, cook mode, local offers etc.

    Leading with innovation A true leader guides the market, and innovation is a powerful way to do so because it requires investments only a few are willing to make. Innovations are also a good way to create PR and attract new consumers.

    How can a recipe website innovate, you may wonder… During my research, I found that analysis on Reddit for banana bread recipes, which, unfortunately, is symptomatic of today’s publishing industry.

    source: https://www.reddit.com/r/assholedesign/comments/j1xorv/search_engine_optimized_recipe_blogs/

    What’s interesting is the author is suggesting a solution and has published a fantastic concept for recipes: Flowchart cookbook

    We need a website!

    Technical Hygiene

    I only crawled the first 10K URLs with Screaming Frog.

    99.4% of the status codes are 200, which is very impressive. I would have expected at least more redirects, given the age of the website.

    Robots.txt: a common mistake, noindex pages that are blocked by the robots.txt

    e.g. https://www.allrecipes.com/cook/17348674/collection/62d9cc29-73c9-3f8b-a635-f4ee0de965ff

    https://www.allrecipes.com/cook/3154470/collection/all-saved-recipes

    If Google robots are not allowed to access the page, they won’t be able to acknowledge the ‘noindex’, resulting in that kind of results “No information is available for this page”

    Suggestion: Simply removing the robots.txt instructions would help Google actually noindexing them and learn to ignore them in the future. Not urgent but cleaner.

    Taxonomies and (near) Duplicate Titles:

    Few duplicated titles could indicate a non-strict enough management of the categories;

    e.g. Title: Authentic Mexican Recipes
    https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/1470/world-cuisine/latin-american/mexican/authentic/
    https://www.allrecipes.com/gallery/best-authentic-mexican-recipes/

    could even be cannibalizing the categories https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/728/world-cuisine/latin-american/mexican/ (title:”Mexican Recipes”)

    Suggestion: Just by looking at the breadcrumbs, they don’t appear to have a strict logic and a ‘chicken’ dish could randomly be classified as ‘dinner>bowl’ or ‘meat and poultry>chicken>chicken tighs’. (probably with a ‘main category’)

    I bet it was ideated a long time ago and barely evolved with the website. It’s a major project but maybe it would be worth revamping it with a more flexible solution by removing most of the not so useful hierarchies and treat categories as tags.

    Part of the project would be to consolidate recipes whenever it makes sense. e.g. Which “french toast recipe” is the most relevant and should rank first? Not hinting Google is letting them decide for you and that’s not a gamble I’m usually willing to take.

    In its current state, the current category page is not creating enough value to rank. https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/149/breakfast-and-brunch/french-toast/

    It could use filters and sorting to help users navigate their best content, feature more prominently the best recipes, the easiest, etc.

    maybe target the ‘best french toast recipes’ in the title so it doesn’t compete with other pages?

    Below all the pages that ranked for ‘french toast recipe’ in the past 2 years. That’s a lot of movements.

    Another hint at their overlooked taxonomies, we can find instances where they link multiple times to the same pages:

    e.g. https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/272/us-recipes/cajun-and-creole/ (see Explore US Recipes)

      

    same here: https://www.allrecipes.com/recipes/1203/everyday-cooking/slow-cooker/main-dishes/chicken/

    Core Web Vitals

    No problem here.

    Closing Thoughts

    Allrecipes provides a really solid experience and has built a great reputation over time. It’s no surprise they’re doing so well, and I’d bet they’ll stay on top for a long time (unless Google decides to integrate recipes into AIO).

    Their content strategy is spot-on, and their technical SEO is more than decent.

    The few fixes and suggestions I made are minor and would only help strengthen their already strong base or just ease the mind of an OCD SEO.

  • 2024 SERPs Winners and Losers (US)

    2024 SERPs Winners and Losers (US)

    I compiled some traffic data (source: AHREFS) for 250+ of the most popular domains and compared the changes YoY.

    Note: some of the biggest domains are missing, AHREFS would not let me download the data for Google, Youtube, Amazon and few other giants.

    see also: Methodology


    Winners – Best Progression YoY

    Looking at which domain gained the most traffic year over year.

    No matter how you look at the data, Reddit is the biggest winner of 2024. Their traffic exploded YoY, and they’re all over the SERPs.

    As sudden as it seems, users’ interest in Reddit has been growing since forever, and Google only started to promote them A LOT to adapt its results to users’ expectations.

    Winners – Top 30 traffic (2023 vs. 2024)

    Reddit.com absolutely blew up, jumping five spots to the top of the list! It crushed the top four from last year.

    Forbes also made some gains despite the huge drawbacks for Advisor.

    Read also: Websites we’ve lost in 2024 – Forbes Advisor

    I’m really curious why the MLB and NBA sites shot up so much this year. I will definitely dig more into that.


    Losing Domains

    Here are the domains that lost the most traffic YoY.

    In the NSFW universe, I guess xnxx losing so much traffic played a role in the rise of xvideos and pornhub. Also wondering if AHREFS is monitoring a good enough sample for adult websites? I’m on the edge of removing them entirely from my future reports, it’s not like I will do a technical audit of them anyways.

    Looking at the parent companies, the most represented in the flop 20 are:

    • Valnet with 3 properties: collider.com, makeuseof.com and movieweb.com (-125M less visits YoY for the 3 domains, -113M total, -21% YoY)
    • and Dotdash Meredith with 4: thespruce.com, byrdie.com, simplyrecipes.com and thespruceeats.com (for a total of -86M YoY, but their total is +8% YoY with a net positive of 162M visits thanks to allrecipes.com)

    Other notable websites already mentioned in the 2024 SEO Necrology: bobvila.com and makeuseof.com


    Publisher Breakdown

    I tried my best to regroup the domains by their parent companies.
    I didn’t account for acquisitions and a website’s traffic is attributed to its current owner.
    For example, CNET’s traffic will be attributed to Ziff Davis, even though it was owned by Red Ventures in 2023.

    Here are the top publishers in estimated traffic for 2024.

    It’s pretty clear that Google didn’t favor content farms publishers this past year.
    Only Dotdash Meredith seems to have won, but even then, if you remove Allrecipes.com from the equation, they’re down 20%.

    A true winner is Future PLC who shows some real YoY growth for its top brands: Techradar (+63% YoY), TomsGuide (+20% YoY) and Space.com (+29% YoY)

  • Remembering Websites we’ve lost in 2024

    Remembering Websites we’ve lost in 2024

    2024 was ruthless—Google swung its algorithmic axe without mercy, slaying even some of the most established websites.

    Let’s take a moment to remember the fallen, a grim reminder that what Google gives can just as quickly be taken away.

    Read Also: SERPS Winners and Losers in 2024

    Forbes Advisor (2019-2024)

    The SEO sitcom of the year! There’s not much more to say about it at this point but if you are just waking up from a coma and want to catch up, Lars Lofgren posts are a great start.

    Forbes Marketplace: The Parasite SEO Company Trying to Devour Its Host (Lars Lofgren)

    You can also read that wild comment on LinkedIn by the former founder of Forbes Mktp, Dr. Achir Kalra aka Liam Neelson TL;DR “I will find you and I will kill you”

    My unsollicited 2 cents on their future: Forbes Advisor, as it existed, can’t be resurrected, but considering they grew a website that quick means they are resourceful and more than capable of a comeback in another form. I’m thinking of Wirecutter that remains largely untouched by Google’s ire despite having a similar structure, with a key difference: NYT acquired Wirecutter, while Forbes Advisor is a separate company piggybacking on Forbes’ domain.

    …or Google will update their guidelines and karate-kick Wirecutter. 🥋🤷‍♀️

    Source: AHREFS – Monthly est. 347k, -95.5% YoY

    https://www.forbes.com/advisor


    CNN Underscored (2017-2024)

    Deja vu. (see Forbes’ drama)

    CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Marketplace Runs Them (Lars Lofgren)

    Source: AHREFS – Monthly est. 72k, -87.1% YoY

    https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored


    The Manual (2014 – 2024)

    Owned by DigitalTrends, it seems they kept stumbling over Google’s updates without managing to course-correct. I’m not very familiar with the brand, and I’d need to look back two or three years to fully understand their downfall but after browsing the site for two minutes, I can’t quite grasp what the brand is about or who its target audience is.

    In 2022, according to SEMrush, they were competing with GQ and Men’s Health (I guess I can see it now… grooming, coffee, cars etc.) but today they feel more like a generic online magazine. It requires a strong brand to be a successful generalist magazine in 2025, even GQ and Menshealth have notably declined in recent years.

    Source: AHREFS – Monthly est. 79k, -88.3% YoY

    https://www.themanual.com


    T3 (2008 – 2024)

    Future PLC’s website has been struggling for a while. Now dipping below 100k monthly visits (source: AHREFS) and with no significant growth in the past two years it might be time to call it. The OG magazine, however, will outlive it—celebrating its 30th birthday in 2025!

    Looking 2 minutes at the site I don’t even feel trying to understand how they ended up here. But one thing stands out, how little they try to differentiate from any other tech publisher: generic images, impersonal titles, unoriginal content. I can’t blame them, this is a sad conclusion that can be observed amongst most of the large publishers today and one of the main reasons so many are spiraling to their death. Back to T3, I would start by removing the Black Friday deals from the homepage just to make it to look like someone is still managing the site (note: written 1/30/2025, BF was 2 months ago).

    Source: AHREFS – Monthly est. 61k, -72.4% YoY

    Smaller names, but a mighty loss

    pawtracks.com, newfolks.com, happysprout.com (2021 – 2024)

    So young! Launched in 2021 by DigitalTrends, the three domains are now flatlining near zero visits per month according to Ahrefs. Since they are sister properties, I was curious to see how their traffic would look on the same chart:

    Interestingly, they started declining around the same period, suggesting a common reason. I might dig deeper into those as they could offer valuable insights into Google’s evolving expectations: they rose and fell so quickly, likely without any drastic changes in strategy or platform on their end.

    At a glance, I checked one of their most popular page from 2012 ie. https://www.pawtracks.com/dogs/how-to-calculate-dog-years/ and as it loaded, my CPU fan got louder. The ad experience is definitely on the heavy side. The content itself is well written, and between the ads, the minimal design is pleasant. Ultimately the website leaves a strong ‘made-for-Google‘ aftertaste, and the reliance on generic stock images (with little context) is sure not helping. The content is somewhat unoriginal and on that page they even link to the first Google result for the same intent (ie. WebMD pets). Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the rare candor from a publisher, as most would rather cut off a limb than linking to a competing website even when relevant. But in this case, creating their infographic (or a better one) could demonstrate a better and less opportunistic commitment to quality content.


    dicebreaker.com (2020 – 2024)

    Acquired last year by IGN (Ziff Davis) along with other gaming-related domains, and immediately followed by layoffs, it’ll be interesting to see what they do with it next as it lost -82% of its traffic YoY. To be fair, it was already in rough shape, and I’d bet IGN got it in a bundle while aiming for the rising rockpapershotgun.com.

    “If you want to beat the competition, don’t just outrun them—buy them and let them rot.” Sun Tzu (it’s not, but could be)

    Source: AHREFS – Monthly est. 42k, -81% YoY

    toptenreviews.com (2003 – 2024)

    It could have been declared dead many times since 2019, I’m not sure why Future hasn’t pulled the plug yet. (monthly est. 21k, -88% YoY). I bet they wanted to give it a real chance and build a strong brand, starting with a top-tier, original design… wait a minute…


    Palliative Care (and hoping to be wrong)

    Some domains, I’ll be keeping a close eye on in 2025 because of how much they have lost recently. They can always turn things around, but we’re talking about huge drops YoY.

    Thrillist (2004 – 2025?)

    Thrillist was hit pretty hard in July/August 2023 and never managed to recover. It was acquired from Group Nine Media the year before by Vox Media and I wonder how much the migration played a role.

    A statement following the mass layoffs in December 2024 hints about the lack of strategy and doesn’t exactly offer an optimistic outlook for the brand’s future.

    “We are incredibly disappointed by management’s decision to decimate Thrillist, a vertical that it has invested almost nothing in since acquiring it from Group Nine (…) we will make sure that they are made whole in light of management’s decision to essentially shutter this beloved publication”

    source: thewrap

    Source: AHREFS

    https://www.thrillist.com


    TheBalance (2016 – 2025?)

    A bit of a tangled mess here, once thebalance.com and thebalancecareers.com but half was redirected to thebalancemoney.com and the rest… gone?

    Let’s take a look at the combined traffic:

    In 2017, they split thebalance.com in two, ultimately killing their momentum. Yet, they did another split in 2022 and lost another 50% overnight. Without further context, it is hard to understand why they pulled the trigger despite the first failed attempt, but I remember the CEO explained how they broke about.com into multiple brands in 2017 (link below), with some domains branching out even further, e.g., verywellfit.comverywellmind.comthespruce.comthespruceeats.com.

    There’s a fine line between boldness and recklessness, and only the outcome reveals which it is.

    Full Q&A: Dotdash CEO Neil Vogel on Recode Media (Vox, 2019)


    MakeUseOf (2012-2025?)

    Another tech publisher, another terrible ad experience.

    Actual screenshot after just one scroll down. Non-negligible benefit: I’m currently using my CPU fan as a hair dryer

    I’m not saying that’s what caused their demise but IMHO, having such a horrendous user experience is not a great sign that the company is interested in delivering the best experience, including the content (in the broader sense, that includes features, imagery, the budget for research etc.).

    Source: AHREFS – Monthy est. 660k, -85% YoY

    Bob Vila (20??-2025?)

    Source: SEMrush

    I find that quote from the former CEO of Recurrent enlightening. It was four shy months before he stepped down and another round of layoffs:

    “We bought Bob Vila right at the beginning of 2020, and it was just four people. [Bob had] been keeping the business relatively small, it’s just four people, it was profitable. We came in and said, “Bob, look at all these different ways we can grow that brand and all these other channels.” Today, Bob Vila is 40 people, and it’s one of our most profitable brands. So we’ve more than 5X the revenue, 5X the audience, it’s a very profitable business. That’s what we’re looking for, really these iconic brands, great businesses that’ll benefit from investment and work really well with the Recurrent model.”

    Lance “profitable business” Johnson

    TL;DR Let’s make money. Bob who?

    Another insightful article about the morale after his departure.

    “Frankly, many people I’ve talked to are looking for the door,” the current employee said. “They just don’t trust the company leadership to make smart decisions.”

    Source: How Recurrent Ventures went from media darling to another publisher hit by layoffs and struggles (BusinessInsider)

    We’re not running charities, and I certainly don’t blame the CEO for talking about profit. But as an insider myself, I know the pressure to prioritize revenue over user engagement and content quality can be damaging. This is just another example.

    I just clicked one random article, a tutorial allegedly co-written by Bob Vila. Not only are the pictures not showing Bob Vila, but most are just stock images.

    not Bob Vila

    Still not Bob vila

    Bob Vila? no

    Turns out, turning a person into a brand is not that easy! (but turning a website into a content farm is a lot easier)

    Business tip: If your plan is to buy MichaelJordan.com (it is for sale btw) and post “How to Dunk” tutorials by Bobby McFumbles, it might not work as expected.


    Important Note: Despite the sarcastic tone, this is no joke. Whether or not Google is heading in the right direction for the Internet, its decisions impact real people in these companies—often leading to mass layoffs. I know some won’t shed a tear over the mass extinction of greedy websites, but as an insider, I can tell you that the SEO and editorial teams—the first to get hit—are usually the ones trying to do things right.

  • Hello world!

    Hello world!

    Like many projects, that one starts with a “hello world”. It is WordPress’ default sample post, and I must have deleted it hundreds of times, but it felt relevant today.

    Who am I?

    I’m an in-house SEO who has worked most of my career for some of the biggest publishers in the US.

    Some of those guys: How 16 Companies are Dominating the World’s Google Search Results (detailed)

    I’d rather not say exactly who I’m working for because it’ll force me to be less transparent, and that’d defeat the purpose. You don’t want me to lose my job, do you?

    What can we expect to read in here?

    Part of my job is to analyze the visibility of my competitors’ websites and determine what they do well and who is on Google’s bad list. So, I compile data and share my competitive analyses internally, but I figured sharing those thoughts with a larger group would be far more enjoyable.

    I hope you’ll have as much fun reading as I enjoy auditing!